Evidence-logged assessment
System Diagnostic
Pricing on request
A System Diagnostic builds on the System Scan by formally reviewing, citing, and logging a defined set of priority public documents and producing an evidence-logged assessment suitable for technical assistance design, reform sequencing, or operational planning.
Not a scorecard
An evidence-bounded diagnostic that makes uncertainty explicit and actionable.
Scope boundary
Public sources only. Assessment is based on a capped set of priority public documents formally reviewed, cited, and logged for scoring; it is evidence-logged, but not a full audit or unrestricted research exercise.
What it produces
01
Observable Flow Readiness Index
With coverage percentage and confidence flagging across all assessed subcomponents.
02
Binding constraint hypothesis
Grounded in verified evidence extracts, covering:
- Execution trunk — budget release, commitment controls, treasury / FMIS / TSA, procurement-to-payment
- Financing channels — contingent finance, risk transfer, and liquidity receipting into government systems
- Distribution (last-mile) — delivery systems moving funds to people, providers, and subnational entities
03
Validation and options agenda
A prioritised agenda including:
- Proof pack — the minimum evidence needed to confirm or revise constraint hypotheses
- Candidate options for operational improvement, to be refined with stakeholders
Tiers
SD-8
Verification capped at up to 8 publicly-accessible sources
Suitable for a robust baseline assessment.
SD-12
Verification capped at up to 12 publicly-accessible sources
Reduces gaps and increases confidence across the assessment.
SD-24
Verification capped at up to 24 publicly-accessible sources
High-coverage assessment for higher assurance use cases.
What you receive — PDF pack
Dashboard
Index + coverage % + constraint locations and weakest factors across the system.
Evidence register
Source list with tier tagging and page / section references for all verified documents.
Constraint narrative
What binds, why it binds, and what would change the conclusion.
Evidence gaps
Flagged subcomponents with implications and proof pack requests.
Next actions
Concise priorities and a proof pack request list — what evidence would confirm or revise the hypotheses.
Who is it for
IFIs, governments, insurers, climate finance providers, UN agencies, and NGOs who need a structured, evidence-logged diagnostic to guide validation, reforms, or operational planning.