Fiscal Hydraulics — Resource Flow Diagnostics for Crisis Finance
Crisis planning
Resource flow diagnostics

Diagnosing where public resources stall — and what unlocks delivery to projects and communities

Fiscal Hydraulics helps you understand whether public finance can move through the system under pressure.

Existing tools assess institutional readiness and instrument design. They do not test whether finance can flow at crisis speed. Fiscal Hydraulics is for decision-makers who need to know whether committed finance can actually move.

The gap this fills

Strong PFM assessments and well-designed instruments do not guarantee delivery when a shock hits.

PEFA and DRR-PFM assess institutional readiness and PFM system quality.

Instrument design focuses on triggers, payout speed, and coverage.

Fiscal Hydraulics addresses the question both leave open: where public finance is likely to stall between approval and delivery.

Three stages. One binding constraint.

Fiscal Hydraulics treats crisis response as a resource-flow problem: identifying where finance is delayed or blocked before it reaches projects and communities. The diagnostic tests three stages of movement — activation, pathway, and execution — to identify the most likely binding constraint.

Crisis event
1
Trigger
Activation speed
How fast is financing released?
  • Contingency conditions met
  • Financing instruments activated
  • Disbursement authority granted
2
Track
Pathway clarity
What route does it take?
  • Approval and release steps
  • Treasury, budget, and control points
  • On-budget and off-budget pathways
3
Transit
Execution capacity
How reliably does it move?
  • Line ministry and local execution capacity
  • Transfer pathways across levels
  • Delivery constraints at the last mile
The subnational gap
Most response is delivered locally, but finance is often held upstream. That gap exposes projects and communities during the most time-critical phase.

When the question is whether resources can actually move

Fiscal Hydraulics is used when the key issue is not only how much financing exists, but whether it can move through real systems quickly enough to reach projects and communities under pressure.

Before pressure builds
Readiness

Assess whether crisis finance is likely to stall before stress conditions hit.

When funding is being set up
Testing

Test whether a financing pathway will work in practice across approvals, controls, and execution steps.

Before committing
Validation

Identify where an instrument, programme, or response pathway may break down before assumptions are locked in.

Start with the level of evidence you need

Use a Scan for a rapid first view, a Diagnostic when stronger evidence is needed, and a Workshop when ownership, assumptions, or coordination are the constraint.

01 — Rapid baseline
Scan

A fast, public-source read of likely flow constraints and evidence gaps. Best when you need a quick first view of where resources are likely to stall before commissioning deeper work.

View System Scan
02 — Verified assessment
Diagnostic

Builds on the Scan with document verification and an evidence register. Best when decisions require stronger evidence, clearer validation, and a defensible basis for action.

View System Diagnostic
03 — Facilitated process
Workshop

A structured session to test the pathway hypothesis, surface contested assumptions, and align agencies around where the real bottleneck sits and what evidence is needed next.

View Map Workshop

A constraint hypothesis and the evidence to support it

A key output is the constraint hypothesis: where the system is likely to bind, how confident that assessment is, and what evidence would change it.

  • A working hypothesis on the main binding bottleneck across activation, pathway, and last-mile execution
  • A confidence-bounded assessment showing what the evidence supports and where gaps remain
  • A proof pack showing the minimum evidence needed to confirm, revise, or challenge the diagnosis
  • A view ready to support reform sequencing, technical assistance, programme design, or delivery support
  • For the System Diagnostic: a formal evidence register with source citations and tier tagging
Conflict reconstruction systems map using Ukraine as an example

Tracing where reconstruction stalls

See how Fiscal Hydraulics maps where reconstruction stalls across finance, readiness, coordination, and delivery. This example shows how system bottlenecks can be visualised, tested, and turned into clearer action.

View the page

Flow maturity survey

Ten questions for a provisional read of where crisis finance is most likely to stall — useful as a first orientation before a Scan or deeper review.

Take the survey
Five maturity levels
Level 1 — Emerging
Level 2 — Developing
Level 3 — Structured
Level 4 — Managed
Level 5 — Optimised
· Around ten minutes · No contact details required · No data collected

How work usually begins

Describe the decision you're working on

If something on this page fits a decision in front of you and you'd like to know more, describe the context and any questions below and click the submit button for a response within 48 hours.

0 / 600
Received.